How can i get lifetime Access Token

Yes, user can do it and the file will get to the account matching this email (whoever is the owner). The same like when you use the official Dropbox application. Where a file put in Dropbox folder goes? 🧐 To your Dropbox account or to account own by some of the application' developers (i.e. Dropbox staff)? 🤔😄

i understand you but where is the point of my app key and app secret in my code if the photo uploaded goes to the user dropbox account not my dropbox account

did you understand me the photo goes to the dropbox account that the user signed with it

during the oauth 2 process

you know in the authorized request it request from the user to sign in in dropbox 'in the browser'

look what chat gpt answere me and i find this very logical:

Hm..🤔 Ok, how the user would know whether the access to their own data is correctly providing to selected code (your application) and not some fake or malicious code? 🧐 On other side, how Dropbox API would ensure the token is provided to correct user and not to some "men in middle"?

PS: OMG...🤦 Is your brain dysfunctional? By the way, your AI (ChatGPT) answer is NOT entirely correct (again), something that should not surprise you, but...

ok then for security reason should the user sign with my own account to i get the photo

how to i know this stuff about man in the middle and that things without any background on it no my brain work fine but chatgpt give me answer and you give me different one

and of my small knowledge im here to ask and learn not to proof myself

---

Ghost Mjrm wrote:

... im here to ask and learn not to proof myself

---

Ok, then it's easy 😉, just learn and not try to put non-trusted knowledge (something against TOS of this forum by the way). In this context let see:

---

Ghost Mjrm wrote:

• Redirect to Dropbox for Authorization:

  • Your app constructs an authorization URL using your app's key and secret and redirects the user to the Dropbox website.

---

Do you use any secret in your authorization URL? 🧐 How many you should know to figure out it's incorrect? 🤷 - just an example. Where app secret is used in? Just take a look in your code - you don't need to proof yourself or something similar. Again, what you'll believe in? 🙂🤫

i have noticed to this before that there is no app secret in the authorization URL but in the next step in exchange authorization code for token my app secret IT HAS ALREADY BEEN USED

private void exchangeAuthorizationCodeForTokens(String code) {
    new AsyncTask<String, Void, Void>() {
        @Override
        protected Void doInBackground(String... params) {
            try {
                String url = "https://api.dropbox.com/oauth2/token";
                String requestBody = "code=" + params[0] +
                        "&grant_type=authorization_code" +
                        "&client_id=" + DROPBOX_APP_KEY +
                        "&client_secret=" + DROPBOX_APP_SECRET +
                        "&redirect_uri=" + DROPBOX_REDIRECT_URI;

Would you like to learn or to proof... not very clear what? 🤔 Might be current ChatGPT stupidity...

---

Ghost Mjrm wrote:

i have noticed to this before that there is no app secret in the authorization URL but in the next step in exchange authorization code for token my app secret IT HAS ALREADY BEEN USED ...

---

And.. what? Is app secret used in URL or not? 🧐 Yes it's used, of course. What would it exist for otherwise? 🙂 By the way, as already mentioned in current discussion, secret is optional in some cases (when correct token receiving can be guaranteed in other way).

i don't want to prove something i admit that i got incorrect information from chatgpt but my brain is not dysfunctional i just got confused because the different answers
you were able to help without using hurtful words to the other party

Ok, sorry, the words just lipped out. I just don't know how to say that such sources are unreliable and how many time to repeat that so it would reach to you. Even more you should be more critical and shouldn't accept such things so... naively believing in them, even when clearly visible they are incorrect. As I said, you're violating TOS too!

AI of any kind will never replace humans intelligence. Don't try replace your own intelligence with something that cannot be better (even in theory). AI could be a good tool, but never replacement.

Good luck.